Google AdsMeta Ads

Summarize ad performance by channel each week

Compare weekly Google Ads and Meta ad performance in an interactive report so the team can see what is improving, slipping, or changing unexpectedly.

Run playbook

Overview

A weekly ad channel performance report compares Google Ads and Meta Ads so your team can see where paid media improved, slipped, or started acting suspiciously.

This playbook turns channel-level performance into a practical tracker and short report. It looks at spend, impressions, clicks, CTR, CPC, conversions, cost per conversion, conversion value, ROAS, caveats, likely drivers, and the next action worth taking.

Use it when the team needs a fast paid media read without doing a full account audit. The output is built for weekly decision-making: what to hold, what to investigate, what to watch, and where budget confidence has changed.

Why you should catch channel shifts early

Paid media reporting gets messy when every platform tells its own tidy version of the week. Google Ads may show one kind of efficiency story, Meta may show another, and a spreadsheet full of raw metrics still may not answer the useful question: what changed enough to matter?

A channel report gives the team a calm, comparable view before the Monday meeting turns into metric archaeology. It keeps Google Ads and Meta Ads on matching weekly windows, labels confidence clearly, and separates real movement from thin data.

That last part matters because ad data is not always final the moment you open the dashboard. Google notes that some performance data is delayed and conversion reporting can lag depending on the metric and attribution setup in its data freshness documentation. A good weekly read leaves room for that instead of declaring victory or disaster too early.

Juno helps by turning the comparison into an operator-friendly report. You get the headline changes, the channel table, the likely explanations, and the few next actions that deserve attention.

Step-by-step

  1. 1
    Confirm the reporting scope, including the brand, ad accounts, channels, currency, markets, reporting week, comparison week, and primary conversion metric.
  2. 2
    Pull the channel-level metrics for Google Ads and Meta Ads over matching completed weekly windows, using the prior completed week as the default comparison.
  3. 3
    Normalize the read before interpreting it by checking naming, currency, channel splits, attribution caveats, missing data, delayed conversions, and any known promotions or budget changes.
  4. 4
    Compare the movement across spend, clicks, CTR, CPC, conversions, cost per conversion, conversion value, and ROAS so the report focuses on changes with decision value.
  5. 5
    Flag the useful patterns: improvements, declines, budget pacing issues, tracking oddities, low-confidence reads, and watch items where the sample is still too thin.
  6. 6
    Write the final tracker and weekly report with status labels, likely drivers, caveats, and recommended actions ranked by urgency and expected impact.

Frequently asked questions

What inputs should I have ready?

Bring access to the Google Ads and Meta Ads accounts, the reporting week, the comparison period, the main conversion metric, and any context that could explain performance movement, such as promotions, budget edits, tracking changes, or platform outages.

Can this work if one ad platform is unavailable?

Yes. Juno can continue with the available platform and clearly label the missing channel. It should not estimate missing spend, conversions, revenue, or efficiency metrics.

How often should I run it?

Run it weekly after the previous full week has closed and platform data has had time to settle. Monday or Tuesday morning is usually the cleanest default.

Is this a full paid media audit?

No. It is a weekly channel performance read. The goal is to spot meaningful changes and next actions quickly, then drill into campaigns only when the channel-level movement needs explanation.